Employee turnover is a big expense.
All-in costs for replacing former employees—when including interviewing, training, reduced productivity, etc—is at least 30% of their annual salary.
No wonder companies are heavily investing in talent acquisition platforms—like applicant tracking systems (ATS).
Bullhorn and Greenhouse spring to mind for seasoned hiring teams as reliable applicant tracking systems. Each recruiting platform improves how companies manage candidates and clients while fostering team collaboration.
But what about HubSpot as an ATS?
In HubSpot vs Bullhorn, we broke down how HubSpot, commonly recognized as a CRM, is just as valuable as Bullhorn for applicant tracking system needs. We discovered that if you’re looking for all-in-one recruiting software with marketing, sales, and operational features—at no extra cost—HubSpot should be considered.
In this sequel, we’ll compare HubSpot as an ATS against Greenhouse. By evaluating both platforms for the core traits of what makes a good ATS—excellent client management, candidate management, and team collaboration features—we’ll find out where you should invest for better hiring outcomes.
Greenhouse is a powerful cloud-based software that refines your hiring workflow through features that improve every step of the hiring process. You can organize resume and candidate details with detailed analytics while managing job applications through a central platform. By offering custom workflows, Greenhouse allows you to share recruitment tasks exactly to fit your needs.
One standout feature is its ability to integrate with over 538 third-party tools and post to 1000+ job boards. You’ll find the application process efficient, with quick-fill forms that candidates complete in about 30 seconds. Once forms are filled, potential new candidates receive timely updates.
On the candidate evaluation side, Greenhouse has a scorecard system for multiple reviewers to independently score candidates, which removes bias when judging potential employees. Teams can stay confident that recruitment supports fair hiring practices with features like bias-free job descriptions and diversity reporting.
Technically, with Greenhouse, hiring professionals can make more data-driven decisions using detailed filters. Looking for hard skills? You can filter for key technical skills. Seeking higher experience levels? Zero in on senior-level requirements. With a plethora of data to sift through, recruitment efforts will be less error-prone when finding the right candidates.
Ultimately, Greenhouse serves mid-to-large companies best, where hiring is constant and processes are formalized. The platform's features are quite robust, and the collaboration toolset, especially for organizations that emphasize structured hiring and group decisions, is arguably the best investment for organizations with high volumes of recruitment.
Traditionally a powerful CRM, HubSpot transforms into a high-performing ATS for small businesses by integrating HubSpot Marketing Pro with either Service Hub Pro or Sales Hub Pro. Together, the truly all-in-one platform equips hiring teams with a custom solution that can be tailored to diverse hiring needs.
You can take your recruiting workflow to the next level by utilizing HubSpot's service, sales, and marketing capabilities. This looks like efficiently tracking applicants throughout various hiring stages with features like pipeline management. You’ll experience fewer recruiting errors while making sure your candidates have positive morale with automated follow-up emails and updated application statuses.
All this is just the tip of the iceberg, too. With HubSpot as an ATS, you can stay confident that the perfect candidate isn’t overlooked by using features like personalized profiles, automated interview scheduling, and even resume parsing with an extra add-on.
Unlike Greenhouse which has recruiting and HR-specific integrations, HubSpot is an all-inclusive business tool with over 1500 app integrations that help companies align marketing, sales, and service. However, its vast functionality makes it an ideal ATS.
By integrating Marketing Pro with Service or Sales Hub Pro, hiring teams can extend HubSpot's uses for custom recruiting campaigns that scale and streamline with existing marketing and sales departments.
For smaller and medium companies that are operationally nimble and aggressive about growth and efficiency, HubSpot as an ATS offers an appealing option to improve recruitment outcomes in a significant way.
The pricing structure differences between HubSpot as an ATS and Greenhouse are like night and day. Our research shows that Greenhouse’s subscription price is based on company headcount, while HubSpot follows a more traditional SaaS approach, basing its price on the number of users.
Greenhouse takes a company-size approach to price, starting at roughly $6,500/year for small businesses of 10 and scaling to $24,500+/year for enterprises with a headcount of over 1000. For every given size range, teams can choose among Greenhouse's three tiers: Essential, Advanced, and Expert.
Each tier includes unlimited users, making it especially appealing for collaborative hiring teams who want to leave excessive user-based costs behind. However, no standard public pricing is available for Greenhouse so what you’ll pay depends mainly on your employee headcount, hiring needs, and contract length—with pricing negotiated based on these factors.
While core functionality for an ATS is included in all Greenhouse plans, what matters to hiring teams may be quite different between the Essential, Advanced, and Expert plans.
The Essential plan includes basic CRM functionality, one recruitment event, and standard multi-channel sourcing tools. Advanced takes these features up a notch to 10 events, internal job boards, and more complex career page configurations. For the Expert plan, teams have no limits on recruitment events, prospect posts, or advanced sourcing automation.
For add-ons that incur extra charges, teams can receive features like messaging, sandbox syncing, and audit logs to get even more granular. Greenhouse currently offers no free plan, only a demo upon request, which hints at its target market of larger companies.
With a pricing structure based primarily on company headcount and unique talent acquisition needs, Greenhouse is well-suited for medium-to-larger orgs that follow more established systems and have high-volume hiring needs.
By contrast, pricing for HubSpot as an ATS is much more SaaS-traditional, with extra costs incurred per user. Starting at $990/month, you get four user seats, with one having access to the platform’s ATS features. Giving ATS access to two extra seats comes in at $90/per user, whereas anything beyond that requires a Marketing Hub Pro upgrade that charges more than $45 per user per month.
The user pricing scenario is tricky to follow, so we created a table to help you better understand:
HubSpot as an ATS Pricing Table |
||
Total Seats |
Monthly Cost |
Notes |
3 seats 3 Marketing users 1 with Service or Sales access |
$990 $900 for Marketing Hub Pro & $90 for 1 additional Service or Sales Hub Pro subscription |
3 users have access to Marketing Hub Pro. 1 user can access Marketing and either Service or Sales Hub Pro. |
3 seats 3 Marketing users 2 with Service or Sales access |
$1080 $900 for Marketing Hub Pro & $180 for 2 additional Service or Sales Hub Pro subscriptions |
3 total users have access to ATS features. 2 of 3 users can access Marketing and either Service or Sales Hub Pro. |
3 seats 3 Marketing users 3 with Service or Sales access |
$1170 $900 for Marketing Hub Pro & $270 for 3 additional Service or Sales Hub Pro subscriptions |
3 total users have access to ATS features. All users can access Marketing and either Service or Sales Hub Pro. |
3+ seats 3+ users with Marketing Hub & Service or Sales Hub |
Custom pricing |
Consult us for specialized pricing |
While many other applicant tracking systems offer time and use-limited demos and trials, HubSpot stands out with its unique pricing tiers (Free, Starter, Professional, and Enterprise), which include a free plan for up to two users. Cautious businesses would benefit from the free plan's non-expiration date to test the platform's CRM capabilities while deciding whether to upgrade as an ATS.
When comparing Greenhouse and HubSpot’s pricing, HubSpot stands out because of its flexible entry points and pricing structure. The platform’s unique offerings allow you to experiment with building a truly custom ATS by integrating different hubs. At the same time, its SaaS user-based pricing helps you adjust seat counts without changing tiers.
Ultimately, with cost control missing in Greenhouse’s company-size pricing, HubSpot is especially appealing for nimble small teams with less complex recruitment needs and lower hiring volumes.
However, we encourage you to schedule a free consultation with our HubSpot experts to find out more accurate costs for Marketing, Service, or Sales Hub Pro and its related integrations.
Changes in pricing are common occurrences in the industry, and directly reaching out ensures you’re up to date.
Making sure your team fully adopts a new ATS is a daunting task that intersects with company culture, human resource policies, and adequate training. Both HubSpot and Greenhouse offer different support approaches for training and implementation that make transitioning from one hiring software to another a breeze for any team.
Greenhouse provides a multi-tiered approach to resources and support that enhances your ability to succeed with the platform. With access to technical specialists who can assist with integration and troubleshooting, along with ongoing training and development, there is an array of tools to help newcomers overcome adoption hurdles.
With HubSpot, you’ll have access to abundant training and support resources to ensure you get the most out of the platform’s varied features. From comprehensive onboarding resources, like guides, webinars, and instructor-led tutorials to HubSpot’s very own Academy that provides certification programs, hiring teams can become pro-HubSpot users that take their recruitment campaigns to new heights.
For training specifics on using HubSpot as an ATS, you will need to hire a Solutions Partner who understands how to customize the platform to address applicant tracking needs.
Managing candidates throughout the hiring process is key to successful recruitment. Both platforms have tools to track applicants, yet they approach candidate management from different angles.
Greenhouse’s approach to organizing candidate information goes beyond basic applicant tracking, offering sophisticated features that streamline the entire hiring process. From initial application to final decision-making, Greenhouse’s candidate management system combines structured evaluation methods, collaborative tools, and automated workflows to create a cohesive recruitment experience.
HubSpot’s applicant tracking uses its CRM to make the process efficient and automated. The platform flips traditional candidate management on its head with its ticket-pipeline system so recruiters can track, sort, and monitor candidates throughout the hiring journey. No more candidates falling through the cracks or scattered communication and documentation.
The platform’s strength is its automation, which removes boring admin tasks and human error from the recruitment process. From automated follow-ups to centralized candidate information management, HubSpot simplifies the entire applicant tracking workflow.
Managing client relationships in recruiting requires a delicate balance between delivering results and maintaining clear communication—-whether you're an internal recruiter working with hiring managers or an agency partnering with client companies. HubSpot and Greenhouse offer distinct approaches to demonstrating value and managing expectations throughout the hiring process, though they tackle these challenges from different perspectives.
Greenhouse excels at managing stakeholder expectations through workflows and reporting. The visual pipeline and dashboard give recruiters visibility into candidate progress so results can be easily shown to hiring managers and stakeholders. With automated task management and approvals, everyone is informed and aligned throughout the process.
The data-driven approach strengthens recruiter stakeholder relationships by giving them concrete metrics and customizable reporting dashboards to show progress and success with initiatives. Standardized interview kits and scorecards give consistency across hiring teams, build trust in the decision-making process, and provide valuable insights for continuous improvement. Recruiters can maintain credibility with stakeholders while delivering results that justify their recruitment strategy and decisions.
HubSpot’s CRM is great for managing stakeholder relationships and expectations. Its ticketing system gives recruiters a centralized, shared inbox to prioritize requests and keep hiring managers informed. This means high-priority roles get the attention they need, and all recruitment activity is tracked.
With automation features like automatic follow-ups, status updates, and candidate tracking, you’ll find it easier to communicate with clients about your progress, and your admin tasks will be less tedious. The system keeps a full history of each candidate—from application to interview notes—so all stakeholders can stay informed.
What’s unique about HubSpot’s ATS capabilities is relationship management. The CRM allows recruiters to build and maintain relationships with candidates and hiring managers. Customized workflows and automation tools mean recruiters can be responsive to stakeholder needs while keeping processes efficient and showing value and progress throughout the hiring journey.
Collaboration in recruitment isn’t just about sharing information–it’s about a collective approach that brings together different perspectives to make better hiring decisions. Whether you’re part of an in-house recruitment team working with department heads or an agency working with client hiring managers, the ability to collaborate with ease can make or break the hiring process.
Let’s look at how these platforms compare on collaboration features and how their different approaches impact team dynamics throughout the hiring process.
Greenhouse is well-suited for team collaboration through its suite of purpose-built recruitment tools. The platform’s structured approach includes shared application reviews, interview kits, and scorecards to ensure consistent evaluation criteria across all interviewers. Automated task management and @mentions keep the process moving quickly and communication clear between team members.
Along with its shared recruitment features, the platform’s strengths are its integrations—it connects with over 538+ third-party solutions to create a collaborative hiring ecosystem.
Whether through mobile apps for on-the-go management or centralized feedback systems to eliminate scattered communications, Greenhouse keeps recruitment structured and distributes the workload across multiple stakeholders.
HubSpot’s approach to team collaboration uses its CRM as the foundation to create a single automated hiring experience. The platform allows team members to interact with one another through automated workflows that connect applicants and hiring managers while storing data in a single location.
The platform's strength is interconnecting all recruitment tools with the CRM so teams can work from the same records. This means end-to-end automation of the hiring process, from job posts and application submissions to interview scheduling and onboarding.
What HubSpot does particularly well is that it improves both the candidate experience and hiring manager’s workflow. By having all recruitment activities in one place, teams can focus on evaluating candidates and making decisions, while the system handles the admin and process management automatically.
Both Greenhouse and HubSpot cover all the important use cases for what makes a good ATS. From simplifying processes to creating pipelines that don’t let candidates fall through the cracks, here’s how both platforms help your hiring outcomes:
However, choosing both platforms isn’t a practical hiring solution for most companies. If you’re stuck deciding, read further to consider the most critical factors.
Greenhouse is a purpose-built recruiting platform with pricing based on company size, starting at roughly $6,500/year. The employee-based pricing and tiered feature system (Essential, Advanced, Expert) means you can invest in more advanced recruitment tools as you grow.
Greenhouse’s strength is its systematic approach to recruitment, having dedicated features that address all parts of the hiring process—from candidate evaluation to stakeholder management. You get interview kits, shared scorecards, and robust Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) tools to ensure consistency across your teams.
Through its central feedback system and 538+ integrations, Greenhouse creates a specialized recruiting ecosystem that transforms traditional hiring into streamlined, data-driven processes that result in successful hires.
We recommend choosing Greenhouse over HubSpot as an ATS in the following scenarios:
HubSpot’s recruiting features use its CRM as the foundation to create a flexible and scalable solution for hiring teams. With a free CRM and modular pricing tiers, you can test the platform before deciding to invest more.
The user-based pricing—starting at $990/year—includes ATS, Sales, and Service Hub Pro access for 1 user and Marketing Hub Pro access for 3 users. This allows you to adjust your spending as you grow, making it perfect for small to medium businesses or those with variable hiring needs.
The platform automates recruitment workflows while maintaining strong relationships with candidates and stakeholders. The ticketing system provides centralized candidate tracking and communication, with customizable workflows for everything from application processing to interview scheduling.
Marketing tools and automated communications maintain engagement throughout the hiring process. Detailed analytics and reporting mean you can show value to stakeholders. With its suite of collaboration tools, automated task management, and mobile access, HubSpot takes traditional recruitment to another level.
All in one platform for marketing, sales, operations, digital content, and recruitment
Built-in email marketing and social media for employer branding
Landing page builder for career sites
We recommend choosing HubSpot over Greenhouse in the following scenarios:
To learn how you can use HubSpot’s CRM features to improve your hiring needs, read “Using HubSpot as an ATS.”